This article is dedicated
to all my little friends, my students who are the aspirant Physiotherapists of
tomorrow and the constant source of our learning and motivation.
And also to all my teachers,
professional colleagues and friends who have been working hard towards our
professional enrichment, development and enhancement.
Have a happy
friendships day.
The commonest dilemma we encounter in
clinical practise as a physiotherapy student is planning the treatment concept
for our patients. Although we know the general line of management, planning the
detailed treatment sometimes becomes a challenge. Setting the treatment goal
for the patient depends a lot on the patients’ assessment. But even here, the
assessment has to be a physiotherapeutic assessment involving the patients’
functional diagnosis rather than purely the medical diagnosis. I don’t mean to
say that the medical diagnosis of the patient is not important, but it does not
lead us to the physiotherapy treatment. Rather, it helps us understand the red
flags and the yellow flags for the patients’ treatment.
E.g., we routinely talk about OA
knee, stroke, Grade III B fracture femur, PA shoulder, CABG, ACL
reconstruction, TKR, Bronchitis, Spinal cord injury, GBS etc. But as Physios,
we do not treat any of these problems. Rather we treat the functional
impairments associated with these problems. In fact, many times, the diagnosis
is purely functional based, e.g. Low back pain, neck pain, weakness etc. In
short, Physiotherapy treatment is more functional impairment driven rather than
structural impairment driven. Again, it’s not that we physios don’t manage any
structural impairment at all. We do work on the tightness (stiffness) of the
muscles, we do mobilise the joints (bread & butter of us manual
therapists), we do help in clearing the chest of secretions or working on the
consolidated/ fibrosed lungs to reduce the pathology, or reduce swelling
(Oedema) or help in accelerating wound healing and in infection control by actinotherapy
etc. But these are just a few examples of the application of physiotherapy in
structural impairment. At least, to my knowledge, I have never heard of
fracture healing, ACL repair, stroke management (of the infarct/ ischemia in
the brain), coronary blockage clearance, articular degeneration treatment by
physiotherapy.
Thus, the most crucial part is
working on the functional aspect of the patient, working on the functional
impairments as well as enhancing the activities and participation of the
patient. This part cannot be understood without being clear in the International
Classification of Functioning (ICF) aspect. ICF deals with a global, holistic
approach to the patient. Rather than looking at the assessment on observation,
palpation and examination in parts, it unites them together to understand the
problems in totality.
E.g. Rather than observing chest
movements or swelling, palpating for chest symmetry or type of swelling
(pitting or non-pitting), examining for chest expansion or amount of swelling
by measuring tape in isolated parts, ICF looks at the Impairment ‘reduced chest
mobility’ (functional impairment) confirmed by observing chest movements,
palpating for chest symmetry and examining for chest expansion by measuring
tape or ‘presence of swelling/ oedema’ (structural impairment) confirmed by observing
site of swelling, palpating for type of swelling (pitting or non-pitting) and
examining for amount of swelling by measuring tape. This helps in identifying
problems faster and planning the treatment goals with more accuracy.
Setting the treatment goals of the
patients are often done looking at the patients’ short term goals. But this
does not make sense as we need to know the final goal, the treatment end point.
For this, the easiest method of treatment planning is the A B C D E method for
goal setting:
A – Actor:
Describes the patient
B – Behaviour:
Describes the need of the patient. It is an important factor as it describes
the level of involvement of the patient, whether the patient wants to or does
not want to be compliant towards rehab.
C – Condition:
Describes the need of the task the patient has to be involved in.
D – Demands of the task:
Describes the demands of the task the patient has to be involved in.
E – Event time:
Describes the times needed to complete the planned goal.
Example: I may have a 30 year old
postman who is from a village and underwent a traumatic trans-tibial amputation
on his right leg. Now the final treatment goal of this patient can be:
The patient, a 30 year old male (actor),
wants to (behaviour) go back to his job as a postman (condition) and
should be able to deliver the letters to all the houses by riding his cycle on
the rough village roads (demands of the task) in a period of 4 months
(16 weeks) (event time).
HOW????
Treatment Options can
be multiple but always rationalise and choose the best possible option
including the details of the therapy, dosage etc. Always have an evidence
backing for your management with recent literatures from reputed journals. Best
possible option means the best and most effective treatment that we can give to
our patients in the given possible situation. It may or may not be the most
ideal treatment. But it has to be the most practicable and realistic option
being offered to the patient.
A] Short term OR Phase
I/ Maximum protection phase/ (0 – 4 weeks):
1) Wound care – wound healing by IR
(luminous) for 15 minutes x 2times/ day [1-2 weeks cryotherapy for
controlling inflammation and pain]
2) Pain relief (VAS was 8/10) – GOAL:
Pain should be VAS 2/10 in 4 weeks: TENS at 150 Hz, 4 electrodes, 2 over sciatic
nerve course & 2 over L4 – S1 nerve roots on right side [Even a IFT can
be used with same arrangement]
3) Strengthening (Strength was
grade 3 on MMT) – GOAL: Strength should be grade 4 in 4 weeks: Active resistive
exercises [Here calculating the 1RM or the RPE would be very important
rather than just 10 reps x 10 count holds which is non-specific to treatment.
Also rather than only strength, training for ENDURANCE is more important.]
Left lower limb closed chain strengthening
(squats by holding the bed end/ railing) till RPE 6/10 on modified Borg scale.
Bilateral upper limb closed
strengthening by scooting/ push ups on the bed till RPE 6/10 on modified Borg
scale.
[Initiation of the
strength/ endurance training can be done by open chain PRE by calculating the
1RM by dynamometer/ spring balance or calculating RPE and train the patient to
50-60% of it]
4) Range of Motion (Knee flexion
was 15 – 65 degrees) – GOAL: ROM should be 0 – 90 in 4 weeks: Active ROM
exercises for the knee [in intra articular stiffness/ hypo mobility, manual
therapy concept with dosage (grade of mobilisation) and direction of glide to
be mentioned]
5) Gait training – with axillary
crutches 3 point NWB gait. Start with standing and swing-to gait progressed to
swing-through gait.
B] Long term OR Phase
II/ Moderate Protection phase (4 – 8 weeks)
1) Stump shaping and conditioning –
Weight bearing on the stump, pressure bandaging/ shrinker for compression,
bridging exercises for gluteal and back extensor strengthening.
2) Strengthening – GOAL: Strength
should be grade 5 in 8 weeks by closed chain exercises till RPE 6/10 on
modified Borg scale.
3) Range of motion – GOAL: Full ROM
should be obtained. Active ROM exercises for the knee to be done 3-4 times in
the day.
4) Pre prosthetic training – GOAL:
Should be able to use PTB prosthesis with a SACH foot.
5) Gait training – with temporary
prosthesis using a pylon and walker/ crutches
C] Phase III/ Minimum
Protection phase (8-12 weeks)
1) Prosthetic training – Gait training
with PTB prosthesis for all functional activities
2) Strengthening – Maintenance of
strength by closed chain exercises till RPE 6/10 on modified Borg scale. Also
focus on endurance training.
3) Proprioception training – For lower
limb by single leg stance, eyes closed standing for 10 sec x 5 sets
4) Gait training – walking on even surface
in controlled environment. Begin ambulation as per patients’ needs. E.g. Begin with
10 meters progressing to 100 meters in 12 weeks.
D] Return to the work
training phase (12-16 weeks)
1) Gait training – uneven surface
in real environment
2) Training for cycling on static
cycle (12 – 14 weeks) – cycling for ½ hour x 4 times/ day x 5 days/ week
3) Training for cycling on moving
cycle on controlled surface (14 – 16 weeks) – cycling for ½ hour x 4 times/ day
x 5 days/ week
The treatment goal of
being able to ride the cycle on the rough village roads for 8 hours/ day
(intermittent) to deliver the letters should be achieved by the end of the 16
weeks. This is only an outline which can be hindered with factors like patient
landing with infection/ fever due to reasons other than infection/ got
transferred etc. But the minimum time frame and treatment plan is extremely
important.
Also treatment has to be realistic
in relation to the pathology. E.g. Instead of a Trans tibial, if this patient
had a Trans femoral amputation, this above mentioned final outcome will not be
possible (considering the limited technology and resources) and alternative
treatment options have to be realised by both the therapist and the patient in
the final goal and return to work phase.
Similar treatment plan can be done
for any condition considering the pathology, healing phase, patients’ age and
requirements. The part B, C & D should be based on re-assessment ensuring
that the patient participates equally and is well informed of the goals of the
treatment and also of the expectations from them in the rehab process. Details
of the phase II, III and IV can be based on these re-assessments, but the
treatment outline, goals and plan should definitely be ready even before
initiation of the 1st treatment session.
In our professional training we are
typically taught the problem solving approach. We are trained to look at what
is wrong with the patient and patch it up. Typically like patching the roads
with tar which has developed potholes rather than focussing on making a
stronger and better road right at the beginning. In ICF, the functional
impairments help us formulate our short term goals which are definitely important
to make the patient normal again to his pre injury status. I always like to
give example of the movies ‘Koi Mil Gaya’ and ‘Krishh’. In KMG, the mentally
challenged hero becomes a powerful hero at the movie end. This is typically
what we do for our patients. It’s like the patient has become a zero and you
are making the patient hero again. But just stopping at this phase is not good
as the patient is at a risk of re-injury once again going back to his zero
status, maybe with a higher level of disability. In Krishh, the lead actor
becomes a superhero from his hero state. This should be the objective from our
Phase III treatment onwards. Along with the problem solving approach, we should
also perform something called as ‘appreciate enquiry’. We need to know
what is good in the patient as well and should enhance these qualities. This
will help us take the patient to a level where he learns not just to compensate
for his weakness (for which we are treating and training them) but also to
reach such a level of fitness and health by which he is never at a risk of
landing with the injury again. This can only be obtained by knowing and
focussing on the structural and functional integrity of the patient and also on
the activities and participation levels of the patient. This can be further
enhanced by knowing the contextual factors of the patients, especially the
environmental facilitators including the architectural, technological, support
systems, family and policies available for health.
We are many times ruled by the
treatment protocol in patient treatment. Every protocol is extremely important in
patient care as it help us keep in line each and every part of the treatment
spectrum. In absence of a protocol, there is always a risk of missing out a
crucial treatment link. In the example cited above, it is very important to
follow the steps and sequences of the treatment. But we cannot forget the
individualisation in the patients’ needs and requirements considering the
patients goals. Thus protocols should form the basis of patient treatment, but
it should also be individualised using the therapists’ knowledge of the
patient, the condition, the pathology, and the sciences of tissue healing and
the needs of the patient.
Again, in the example cited above,
nowhere are we treating the structural or medical pathologies. We are looking
and treating the movement dysfunction, dyskinesia’s, abnormal muscle
recruitments, sensory dysfunction, functional loss and loss of involvement in
daily life’s situations. Thus, as physiotherapists, we should be more trained
in understanding and assessing these problems and managing them rather than
conditions and medical diagnosis. There may be surely other views and opinions
on the same and they all are respected and welcomed. No way is medical
diagnosis lesser important to be learnt and understood. It, many times, helps
us in re-assessment or understanding the problem being treated. It also helps
us all to speak the same common language of patient care between all the care
giving professionals. But as physiotherapists, we should also be focussing more
on physiotherapeutic assessment and diagnosis and treatment as well.
Thus, I would again like to say
that planning the clients treatment plan is an art, a science and also a
commerce as it involves not only the skills of treatments, the evidences and
the logics behind it backed by an efficient research methodology and
publications but also involves the financial management of treatment expenses, of
learning to have a proper documentation of the treatment procedures and also of
the financial transactions, payment receipts and bills, legal knowledge of the
laws and legislature of the state in relation to Physiotherapy practices, partnering
with the professional councils and associations governing profession and the
professionals and very important, being accountable and answerable to your
clients, your own self and finally to GOD who blessed us all in this noble and honourable
profession.