Showing posts with label Gym ball. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gym ball. Show all posts

Sunday, 25 March 2018

Scapular Considerations in Racquet Sports



Injuries in the Racquet Sports
  • Racquet sports, especially lawn tennis and badminton have been gaining popularity in Asian countries like India.
  • With this increase in popularity, the injury rate in the sport has also increased.
  • The injury rate in tennis varies from 0.04 injuries/1000 hours to 21.5 injuries/1000 hours
    • Pluim BM, Staal JB (2006)
  • Different overhead sports show different characteristics, but have similar movement patterns.
  • In each, the dominant upper limb is subjected to repeated overhead movements.
    • Torres RR, Gomes JL (2009), Wilk KE, Meister K (2002)



Racquet Sports – Biomechanics

  • The mechanics of an overhead stroke or serve in racquet sports are similar to that of an overhead throw, wherein the shoulder has to be lax enough to allow the extra degrees of external rotation necessary for an adequate serve and at the same time has to be stable enough to prevent any subluxations.
    • Craig A. (1995)
  • This delicate balance between mobility and stability is referred to as ‘throwers paradox’ and if compromised, can lead to injury.
    • Wilk KE, Meister K (2002)

  • A racquet serve/stroke is a combination of true gleno-humeral rotation, trunk hyperextension and scapulo-thoracic motion.
  • The cocking phase maintains the dominant arm in 90° abduction and external rotation which reaches a maximum of 172° to 180° during the late cocking phase.
    • Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW (1996), Fleisig G, Nicholls R (2003), van der Hoeven H, Kibler WB. (2006)
  • It ends with internal rotation and forward flexion of the dominant shoulder along with upper torso and pelvic rotation during the follow through phase.
    • Jason A. (2007) 

The GIRD:

  • Each phase places an asymmetric load between the two shoulders, with the dominant shoulder exposed to maximum stress. Jason A. (2007) 
  • Studies have shown a significant difference in the gleno-humeral internal rotation range of motion between dominant and non-dominant shoulders of overhead sport players.
    • Shimpi AP, Shah B (2015). Shah N, Shimpi AP (2016)
  • This is defined as ‘Gleno-humeral internal rotation deficit’ (GIRD), which is the loss in degrees of the gleno-humeral internal rotation of the throwing shoulder compared with the non-throwing shoulder.
    • Burkhart SS, Morgan CD, Kibler WB. (2003)
  • An accepted level of GIRD is less than 20° deficit of gleno-humeral internal rotation or less than 10% deficit of the total rotation seen in throwing shoulder as compared to the non-throwing shoulder.
    • Burkhart SS, Morgan CD, Kibler WB. (2003)
  • The scapula provides a stable base to the movement of humeral head during an overhead motion. The stability of the scapula becomes important in these movement patterns. Jason A. (2007) 


SICK Scapula….
  • An asymmetry develops in the scapular posture of overhead athletes like tennis players, where the dominant scapula is more protracted than the non-dominant side.
    • Oyama S, Myers JB (2008). Shimpi AP, Shah B (2015)
  • The acronym SICK scapula (scapular malposition, inferior medial border prominence, coracoid pain and malposition and dyskinesis) is used to describe this asymmetry of scapula.
    • Burkhart SS, Morgan CD, Kibler WB  (2003)
  • This asymmetry is accentuated in unilateral overhead athletes who use their dominant shoulder repetitively in a forceful manner.
    • Oyama S, Myers JB (2008). Shimpi AP, Shah B (2015)
  • Many authors suggest that this increased scapular protraction along with GIRD, increases the likelihood of shoulder injuries in these players.
    • Wilk KE, Obma P (2009). Thomas SJ, Swanik KA (2010)
  • Shoulder girdle injuries account for 17.27% in racquet players with 43.4% of elite tennis players presenting with scapular dyskinesia.
    • Borsa PA, Laudner KG (2008). Kondric M, Matkovic BR (2011)
  • Studies have also shown a positive association between a dyskinetic scapula with posterior shoulder tightness and GIRD in the dominant arm of overhead players.  Laudner KG, Moline MT (2010). McClure P, Greenberg E (2012)
  • During the follow through phase, the scapula has to protract around the thoracic wall in order to help dissipate the energy.
    • Kibler WB. (1991). Voight ML, Thomson BC. (2000)
  • In the presence of considerable GIRD, the players have to bring about increased scapular protraction to compensate for the reduced internal rotation in order to maintain the velocity of the overhead stroke.
    • Thomas SJ, Swanik KA (2010). Shimpi AP, Shah B (2015)
  • With time, this continuous stress causes soft tissue adaptations and leads to weakness of the scapular stabilizers, mainly the lower fibres of rhomboids causing an upward rotation.
    • Thomas SJ, Swanik KA (2010). Shimpi AP, Shah B (2015)
  • Thus, the scapula cannot provide a stable base of support for the rotator cuff to function, which reduces its efficiency and increases stress on the static restraints of the dominant shoulder. Thomas SJ, Swanik KA (2010)

  • So, rather than compressing the humeral head into the glenoid fossa, the rotator cuff pulls the scapula upward and laterally resulting in greater scapular protraction and external rotation.
    • Kibler WB. 1998. Shimpi AP, Shah B (2015). Shah N, Shimpi AP (2016)

Why Scapular Perspective?
  • During the follow through phase of an overhead motion, the shoulder joint is subjected to distractive forces of up to 750N which is mainly resisted by the postero-inferior capsule.
    • van der Hoeven H, Kibler WB. (2006)
  • With repetitive loading, the posterior capsule is said to undergo micro trauma causing hypertrophy and increased fibroblastic activity during the healing process, leading to contracture and thickening of the capsule. Thomas SJ, Swanik KA (2010)
  • This reduces the capsular pliability causing restriction of internal rotation, extension and horizontal adduction.
    • van der Hoeven H, Kibler WB. (2006). Thomas SJ, Swanik KA (2010). Shimpi AP, Shah B (2015)

  • A posterior capsule stretching program incorporated in the rehabilitation and training of overhead players is reported to reduce the incidence of GIRD.

  • It also reduces the incidence of shoulder injuries like Superior Labrum Anterior Posterior (SLAP) lesions in these players.
    • Burkhart SS, Morgan CD, Kibler WB (2003)
  • Arthroscopic studies have also shown increased thickness and hypertrophy of capsule in the postero-inferior recess of dominant arm of throwers and its positive association with GIRD, external rotation and scapular upward rotation. Thomas SJ, Swanik CB (2011)
  • Studies have shown that for a 4° decrease in internal rotation, there is 1cm decrease in horizontal adduction, which is an indicator of posterior capsule tightness.
    • Torres RR, Gomes JL (2009)
  • Studies also showed a significant increase in the external rotation of the dominant shoulder compared to non-dominant side in racquet players and when compared to dominant side of non-racquet players.
    • Shimpi AP, Shah B (2015)
  • One of the causes can be attributed to the contracted or shortened posterior band of the inferior gleno humeral ligament (IGHL) which primarily provides restraint to further movement in position of maximum abduction and external rotation during late cocking phase. Burkhart SS, Morgan CD, Kibler WB. (2003)
  • It prevents posterior migration of humeral head, thus centering it in the glenoid fossa allowing a normal arc of movement.
    • van der Hoeven H, Kibler WB  (2006)
  • Arthroscopic findings in overhead players show contractures and thickening in the zone of the posterior band of IGHL.
    • van der Hoeven H, Kibler WB  (2006)

  • The tethered posterior band draws the humeral head postero-superiorly to a new point of rotation on the glenoid, thus causing an abnormal increase in the external rotation due to easier clearance of the greater tuberosity.
    • van der Hoeven H, Kibler WB  (2006)
  • The postero-superior migration of humeral head also reduces the cam effect of the humeral head and antero-inferior humeral calcar on the antero-inferior capsule leading to redundancy in the antero-inferior capsule, allowing hyper external rotation of the dominant arm. Burkhart SS, Morgan CD, Kibler WB. (2003). Burkhart SS (2007)

  • Another explanation for the increased external rotation can be possibly attributed to increased humeral retroversion which is a common finding in players playing overhead sports.
    • Kibler WB, Sciascia A (2012)
  •  This change in the humeral head causes a shift in the arc of rotation of the dominant shoulder favoring external rotation.
    • Tokish JM, Curtin MS (2008)
  • However, the studies suggest that the total arc of rotation remains the same, as any increase in the external rotation will require a corresponding decrease in the internal rotation, which will be permanent. Lintner D, Mayol M (2007)

  • There exists presence of abnormal scapular resting position in asymptomatic racquet players on the dominant side in the form of scapular external rotation and elevation on the dominant side as compared to their non-dominant side.
  • There also exists presence of gleno-humeral movement dysfunction in the form of reduced internal rotation, extension and adduction and gain in external rotation on the dominant side.
  • A comparison between symptomatic and asymptomatic players could help determine the pathological threshold for injury predisposition.
  • ROM and scapular resting position can be used as a screening tool for injury prevention in overhead racquet players.
    • Shimpi AP, Shah B (2015). Shah N, Shimpi AP (2016)

Advanced Training
  • Most important is to prepare the athlete for a long term, not just for the coming season.
    • Nyland J (2010)
  • Functional exercises simulating the athletes role and Sports Specific Scapular training is extremely important.
  • This helps in gaining an excellent neuromuscular control and functioning.
  • More useful in establishing athletes self efficacy and confidence as movements closely resemble the athletes sports specific movements.
    • Nyland J (2013)
  • Functional training can be achieved by training the athlete in a sports simulation by:
  • A. Uni-planar training the protractors.

  • B. Uni-planar training of the retractors.

  • C. Bi-planar motion training

  • D. Multi-planar motion training.

  • E. Simulation of the game with resistive training
    • Nyland J (2011)

  • Further enhancement can be obtained by using unstable surface like the BOSU for bodily challenges and further enhancement.
    • Wankhede N, Shimpi A (Hypothesis)
  • This can be challenged using:
  • A. Strength training on BOSU

  • B. Limb and trunk challenges

  • C. Focused stability challenge

  • D. Hit and serve challenges.


Summary
  • Injured overhead athletes may display more asymmetry than healthy overhead athletes, and there may be a pathologic threshold for scapular posture asymmetry at which an asymmetry becomes problematic. Shimpi AP, Shah B (2015)
  • Need of specific stretching and strengthening as a part of the pre-season training of racquet athletes to address muscular imbalances to provide optimum scapular and gleno-humeral stability to the shoulder to endure the demands of the game. Nyland J (2013)

  • Need for advanced training to prepare the athlete in prevention of injuries and correct the problems before they become real problems for the athletes. Wankhede N, Shimpi A (Hypothesis)

References:

Shimpi AP, Bhakti S, Roshni K, Rairikar SA, Shyam A, Sancheti PK. Scapular Resting Position and Gleno-Humeral Movement Dysfunction in Asymptomatic Racquet Players: A Case-Control Study. Asian J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;6(4):e24053. doi: 10.5812/asjsm.24053. Epub 2015 Dec 1. PubMed PMID: 26715968; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4691306.



Shah NA, Shimpi AP, Rairikar SA, Ashok S, Sancheti PK. Presence of scapular dysfunction in 
dominant shoulder of professional guitar players. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2016 Sep;22(3):422-5. 
doi:  10.1080/10803548.2016.1154720. Epub 2016 Mar 29. PubMed PMID: 27023289.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27023289
 
Others Available on Request




Sunday, 26 February 2017

Rehabilitation in Athletes Post ACL Reconstruction


ACL Rehabilitation from a Physios perspective
¢  Young patient/ Athlete
¢  Active lifestyle/ Activity level
¢  Future Participation expectations
¢  Traumatic injury mechanism
¢  General health and presence of co morbidities
¢  Functional Goal Setting: Athlete may need to attain functional independence in BADL’s and also in relation to work demands and rarely to attain the sports activities being played.
¢  But these functional goals will be constantly changing based on aging, lifestyle and general health.
¢  Important is to prepare the athlete for a long term, not just for the coming season.
¢  Nyland J, 2010

Indications for Arthroscopic Repair/ Reconstruction:
¢  Injured ligament (different healing capabilities)
¢  Location & size of lesion
¢  Degree of instability experienced by patient
¢  Other associated injury – meniscal tear, articular damage etc
¢  Patients desired level of function
¢  Risk of re-injury
¢  Prevention of future impairment


ACL Recon – Physiotherapists consideration
— Indication for ligament surgery – Failed conservative mgmt, early degenerative changes seen, pain/ loss of function.
— Type of ligament surgery:
     Intra articular, extra articular, combined procedures
— Grafts used:
     Autograft, allograft, synthetic, area of harvesting etc.
¢ Type of fixation in bone tunnel/ socket

Pre operative physiotherapy
¢  Patients with ACL deficiency should participate in preoperative physical therapy before ACL reconstruction to maximize dynamic knee-stabilizing potential
                        Keays SL et al, 2006
¢  Deficits in pre-operative quadriceps strength influence function 6 months after ACL reconstruction
                        David Logerstedt et al, 2013

Pre-Operative management & goals
¢  Oedema Control
¢  Minimize muscular atrophy
¢  Maintain ROM as much possible
¢  Protected ambulation
¢  Patient education

Pre-Operative Exercises
¢  Open and closed kinetic chain exercises,
¢  Dynamic quadriceps-hamstring co-activation
¢  Calf muscle strengthening
¢  Small arc plyometrics
¢  Single-leg balance activities
¢  Lower extremity stretching
¢  Neuro-muscular training
¢  Patient education

Surgical Context
¢  Less invasive surgery reduces acute care and increases rehabilitation timetable decisions.
¢  Nyland J et al, 2010
¢  Repair, instead of reconstruction, with lesion-site scaffolding, innovative suturing methods and materials, and evolving use of biological healing mediators such as platelet- rich plasma and stem cells has prompted reconsideration of primary ACL repair.
¢  ACL repair rather than reconstruction is more likely to preserve the native neuro-sensory system, entheses, and ACL footprints.
¢  Nyland J. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Feb.

Post operative management & goals
¢  Restoration of joint stability & motion
¢  Pain free & stable weight bearing
¢  Sufficient post operative strength & endurance to meet functional demands
¢  Ability to return to pre injury activities
¢  ‘Injuries around the Knee’ Symposium: Sancheti Parag et al, Br J Sports Med, 2010
¢  Reduction of Kinesiophobia which common post ACL reconstruction.
¢  Shah RC, Sancheti PK. IJPR, 2017

Post operative management
Nyland J et al, 2010
Phase
Goal
Duration
1
Maximum protection phase
Early acute care
Re-establish independent activity of daily living function
Sensori-motor training bias
0–4 wk
2
Moderate protection phase
Progressive transition from “patient” to “athlete” role
Re-establish strength, power, and endurance
Blend resistance and neuromuscular training
5–26 wk
3
Minimum Protection phase
Sport-specific training
Neuromuscular training bias
27–36 wk
4
Return to Sports Phase
Return to play decision-making
1, highly controlled functional activities to individual tasks performed on the playing field with oversight by the clinician;
2, individual workouts with oversight by the coach and clinician;
3, workouts with two or three teammates with oversight by the coach and clinician;
4, return to unrestricted practice with full team;
5, release to competition.
37–52 wk

Maximum protection phase – weeks 0 – 4
            TREATMENT GOALS:
¢  Protect healing tissues and surgical wound care
¢  Prevent reflex inhibition of muscles with pain management
¢  Reduce joint effusion
¢  ROM 0 – 110°
¢  Active control of ROM
¢  Weight bearing 75% to tolerance (depends on specificity of tissue repaired)
¢  Early controlled weight bearing does not compromise knee joint stability and provides a better outcome in terms of VMO function
                        Tyler TF Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998


Intervention
           
Early: Days 0 – 14
¢  Pain Management
¢  Gait training – crutches PWB
¢  Passive to active ROM (with range limiting braces if required)
¢  Using CPM for ROM does not offer any additional benefits
¢  Rosen MA Am J Sports Med, 1992
¢  Patellar mobilization
¢  Muscle setting exs. – Quads, hams, adductors at multiple angles
¢  Assisted SLR in supine (with brace when needed)
¢  Ankle pumps


Late: weeks 2 – 4
¢  Continue previous exs.
¢  Full weight bearing & closed chain exs for hip & knee muscles (with permission)
            (Not in meniscal injuries)
¢  Low resistance PRE in open chain activities
¢  Core stabilisation exs
¢  Aerobic conditioning – static cycles
¢  Side planks
¢  Optimal muscle lengthening (rectus femoris, TFL, Glutei, hip ext rotators, adductors, hamstrings)

Establishing the self confidence of the Athlete
¢  Functional exercises simulating the athlete’s role extremely important in the early phase.
¢  This helps in gaining an early neuromuscular control and functioning.
¢  More useful in re establishing patients self efficacy and confidence as movements closely resemble the athletes sports specific movements.
¢  May also be useful in reducing kinesiophobia post surgery.

BRACING
¢  Using a functional brace or a neoprene sleeve post arthroscopic repair helps in improving joint position sense in early rehab phase.
                        Beynnon BD, J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2002
                                Brandson S et al Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2001
¢  More useful for patients with innate ligamentous laxity.
¢  Useful in increasing patients’ confidence and lowering the kinesiophobia.
             

Moderate protection phase weeks 5 – 26
TREATMENT GOALS:
¢  Full pain free ROM
¢  Strength Gr. 5/5
¢  Dynamic joint (knee) control
¢  Improved kinesthetic awareness
¢  Normalise gait pattern & ADL function
¢  Home exercise program

Intervention
            Early – weeks 5 – 6:
¢  Multiple angle isometrics
¢  Advanced closed chain strengthening & PRE
¢  Stretching exs
¢  Endurance training
¢  Proprioceptive training – single leg, tilt board
¢  Stabilization exercise with elastic bands


Proprioceptive training and core strengthening
¢  Both form important aspects of phase 2 rehabilitation.
                            Lephart SM Am J Sports Med, 1997
¢  Lack of core strengthening and proprioceptive training post arthroscopic cruciate reconstruction have been found to be associated with reduced stability and performance in patients
                        Cinar-Medeni O, Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2014


Intervention
            Late – weeks 7 – 10:
¢  Continue with previous exs
¢  Advance strengthening (PNF patterns)
¢  Endurance & flexibility training
¢  Advanced Proprioceptive training
¢  Walking/ jogging
¢  Initiate plyometrics training (with permission in athletes)


Virtual Reality Training
Non Immersive VRT can also be used as an effective mode of training for enhancement of balance and knee functions post ACL recon.
Wani S, Shah S, Sancheti PK, 2017 (Unpublished)

Minimum protection phase
 weeks 27 - 36:
TREATMENT GOALS:
¢  Increase strength, power & endurance
¢  Improve neuromuscular control, dynamic stability & balance
¢  Improve cardio pulmonary fitness

Joint stability achieved by Neuro-musculoskeletal system

Intervention
¢  Continue stretching program
¢  Advanced PRE. Initiate isokinetic training if desired.
¢  Advanced close chain exercises & plyometrics drills.
¢  Advanced Proprioceptive training.
¢  Progressive agility drills (fig of 8, specific drills)
¢  Progress running program



Sports specific training of a badminton player post ACL reconstruction Using a stability trainer, BOSU ball with dome up and with flat side up. Training with single ball, double balls and badminton racquet and shuttle cock. 

Return to Sports phase: 
6 months & beyond
TREATMENT GOALS:
¢  Increase strength, power & endurance
¢  Regain ability to function at highest desired level
¢  Maintenance program
¢  Reduce risk of re-injury

¢  Balance and Proprioception training for a sprint athlete

¢  Plyometrics training (Sports Specific)

¢  Sports specific training for a basket ball player using multi-planar motions and BOSU ball

Intervention
¢  Progress PRE & flexibility exercises
¢  Advanced agility drills
¢  Sports specific drills
¢  Need of protective bracing prior to return to sports.


Return to Sports Criteria
¢  Adequate restoration of operated limb strength, power, endurance and perceived function.
¢  Ability to perform 10 sec duration, maximal effort single leg hops on operated leg in multiple directions to overcome GRF.
¢  Nyland J. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013
¢  Force plates can be used to understand the reduction in torque production and need for additional rehabilitation.
¢  Nyland J. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011.
¢  Acceptable is till 90% of force production as compared to the normal limb.


Sports Maintenance Therapy
¢  Continue Neuro-muscular conditioning.
¢  Monitor single leg press capability.
¢  Nyland J, Neurophysiol. 2003
¢  Perform regular pre-season and in-season neuromuscular training with special focus on the landing techniques.
¢  Training of neuromuscular responsiveness and balancing of the hip and the ankle-foot in addition to the knee.
¢  Nyland J, Knee 2014

Current trends in rehabilitation
¢  Shift towards individually tailored/ modified programs depending on functional requirement of the individual
¢  Functional training programs – exercises similar to sports specific requirements of the individual athlete.
¢  Limited Use of CPM machines
¢  Cryotherapy pre-op/ post-op beneficial to control pain and swelling
¢  Functional Testing to assess joint stability
¢  Emphasis on Proprioceptive and Neuromuscular Training
¢  Patient Perceived joint stability most important criteria for Prognosis
¢  Time not a major factor in determining treatment progression
¢  ROM, muscle strength and patient perceived joint stability most important criteria for exercise progression.
¢  Less invasive surgery reduces acute care and accelerates rehab.
¢  Nyland J. OAJSM. 2010

Things to remember!
¢  No fixed Protocol for rehab
¢  Modify Exercises by regular client evaluation
¢  Task Specific and Functional Exercises more effective. Train not just the knee, but also the brain.
¢  Return to sports is a biological, psycho-behavioural and biomechanical readiness factor.
¢  Rehabilitation greatly influenced by level of motivation of the patient and compliance to the exercise program.

References:
Available on request